0 Commentaires
0 Parts
202 Vue
0 Aperçu
Rechercher
Découvrez de nouvelles personnes, créer de nouvelles connexions et faire de nouveaux amis
-
Fil d’actualités
- EXPLORER
-
Pages
-
Groupes
-
Evènements
-
Blogs
-
Offres
-
Emplois
-
Courses
-
Connectez-vous pour aimer, partager et commenter!
-
The "Absolute" Offence: Fighting a driving without insurance Charge (Section 143) in the Surveillance Age of 2026In the hierarchy of motoring offences, driving without insurance (contrary to Section 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) occupies a unique and dangerous position. It is known in law as a "strict liability" offence. This means that your intent is irrelevant to the verdict. The court does not need to prove that you intended to drive without insurance, or even that you...0 Commentaires 0 Parts 238 Vue 0 Aperçu
-
The "Strict Liability" Trap: Defending the Indefensible Charge of Driving Without InsuranceDriving Without Insurance (Section 143 RTA 1988) is a "strict liability" offence. This means your intent does not matter. The court does not care if you thought you were insured. It does not care if it was an honest mistake. If you were driving a vehicle on a road and no valid policy was in force, you are guilty. The penalty is severe: 6 to 8 penalty points and a fine. For many...0 Commentaires 0 Parts 102 Vue 0 Aperçu
-
When 'I Didn't Know' Isn't a Defence: The 'Special Reasons' Argument for Driving Without InsuranceIt is a scenario that can happen to even the most careful of drivers. You are pulled over for a routine check, and to your genuine horror, the police officer informs you that your insurance policy has lapsed or been cancelled. Your immediate, honest reaction is, "But I had no idea! I thought I was insured." In the eyes of the law, however, this heartfelt plea is not a valid defence. The offence...0 Commentaires 0 Parts 627 Vue 0 Aperçu
-
The Anatomy of a "Special Reasons" Argument: A Legal Deep DiveWhen facing a charge of driving without insurance, and a technical defence isn't available, the primary goal shifts to avoiding the significant penalty points (6-8) that usually accompany a conviction. The only legal mechanism to achieve this, after pleading guilty, is the complex and highly specific "special reasons" argument. Successfully persuading a court not to endorse points requires far...0 Commentaires 0 Parts 415 Vue 0 Aperçu